CCLI Call for Proposals – Presentation Consideration Rubric
| CATEGORY | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Clarity and Organization of Proposal | Proposal is very well-written, easy to understand, and logically organized | At times proposal is confusing / does not follow as fluidly as possible |
Proposal lacks clarity overall and is somewhat disorganized |
Proposal is very difficult to understand and is disorganized |
| Relevance to Theme | Proposal is closely aligned with the conference theme | Proposal is moderately aligned with conference theme | Proposal’s applicability to conference theme is limited | Proposal is outside the scope of the call for proposals |
| Timeliness and Applicability to Attendees | Proposal addresses a topic that is extremely timely and likely to be of interest to a wide range of attendees | Proposal addresses a topic that is somewhat timely and likely to generate some interest amongst attendees | Proposed topic has been covered in-depth in many other forums, and is of limited interest | Proposed topic is not timely or applicable to attendees. |
| Incorporation of Active Learning | Proposal mentions active learning to a high degree | Proposal places some emphasis on active learning | Proposal places little emphasis on active learning | Proposal places no emphasis on active learning |
| Quality of Learning Outcomes | Learning outcomes are clear and achievable | Learning outcomes are for the most part clearly identified and achievable | Learning outcomes lack clarity and may not be achievable in time allotted | Learning outcomes are not clearly identified or achievable |
Final selection of proposals will also consider diversity of institution types and topics